On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 4:27 PM Marco C. <[email protected]> wrote: > Let me try to explain the methodology so you can open your mind: > (..) > Open your mind. Peace. > Marco Casaroli
We are open-minded Marco, very, it is highly unfair to say we are not. You need to take into a consideration that all NuttX related work is done in our free time at the expense of any other tasks sometimes our families and so called private human life. We are also people taking personal responsibility for the products development, its delivery, and maintenance. If things take too complex and too long to deliver we are out of business. If things fail on production we are out of business. If we are unable to maintain and service products we are out of business. This out of business also means measurable financial responsibility. Most of us are owners of the company, business, product. We have experiences that made us have solid stand on the ground and think the way we think. Its okay to play around and experiment, but its not okay to impose experiments on everyone around, like so called modern world does right now. We cannot build without solid foundations, when all components change all the time, including software and recently even hardware components. Its a big complex mess right now. We do not want to make it worse or even take part ourselves. This is clearly destructive. We can play around but then we need to provide alternative path to be selected, while foundations must remain rock solid, so people have choice. I understand you use free AI to create stuff, but in the end there are living humans paying bills daily that need to process that also for free in their free time. My proposition for the people with lots of free time is to create an experimental but separate AI NuttX rewrite and see how it goes. It should be a win-win scenario where we can cope with basic tasks in NuttX while the other project may explore new worlds. Peace :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
