Well I know the JSR170 but not the ode. What do you mean by the message correlation code would need to be hand coded, do you just mean a piece of code that would be specifically hand coded for the JSR170 DAO's.
On 9/4/07, Maciej Szefler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > don't know much about JCR, but yes, in theory you'd need to reimplement > the > DAO in the JCR170 "medium". A warning though, there are things that you > would almost certainly create problems, in particular the message > correlation code really needs to be hand-coded in something like JDBC to > work correctly. > > -mbs > > On 9/4/07, harvey waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Would the bean encoder be a better appoach than developing a jcrDAO > layer > > ? > > are you thinking that the bean encoder would allow you to use other > > repositories than the jsr170 ? > > > > On 9/4/07, Nicolas Modrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hey Harvey, > > > > > > Storing a workflow has been done in the magnolia CMS. > > > > > > You may be interested in looking at: > > > http://www.openwfe.org/openwfe-jcr-beancoder.html > > > > > > It should be quite easy to plug it or something similar to ODE. > > > > > > Niko, > > > > > > > > > On Sep 4, 2007, at 6:00 PM, harvey waters wrote: > > > > > > > I would like to use ode with a jsr170 persistance layer (Apache > > > > JackRabbit), > > > > basically I want to be able to be able to persist the workflow (and > > > > its > > > > state) in the content repository. Am I right in thinking that I > > > > would need > > > > to develop a jsr170 dao layer. Is this feasable and is there > > > > someone out > > > > there who is already doing it ? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Harvey > > > > > > > > >
