hi,
there is a ocm (object content mapping) (sub) project in the
jackrabbit contrib folder
(http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/trunk/contrib/jackrabbit-jcr-mapping/)
which might be from interesst.

regards, philipp

On 9/4/07, harvey waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I know the JSR170 but not the ode. What do you mean by the message
> correlation code would need to be hand coded, do you just mean a piece of
> code that would be specifically hand coded for the JSR170 DAO's.
>
> On 9/4/07, Maciej Szefler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > don't know much about JCR, but yes, in theory you'd need to reimplement
> > the
> > DAO in the JCR170 "medium". A warning though, there are things that you
> > would almost certainly create problems, in particular the message
> > correlation code really needs to be hand-coded in something like JDBC to
> > work correctly.
> >
> > -mbs
> >
> > On 9/4/07, harvey waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Would the bean encoder be a better appoach than developing a jcrDAO
> > layer
> > > ?
> > > are you thinking that the bean encoder would allow you to use other
> > > repositories than the jsr170 ?
> > >
> > > On 9/4/07, Nicolas Modrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey Harvey,
> > > >
> > > > Storing a workflow has been done in the magnolia CMS.
> > > >
> > > > You may be interested in looking at:
> > > > http://www.openwfe.org/openwfe-jcr-beancoder.html
> > > >
> > > > It should be quite easy to plug it or something similar to ODE.
> > > >
> > > > Niko,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sep 4, 2007, at 6:00 PM, harvey waters wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I would like to use ode with a jsr170 persistance layer (Apache
> > > > > JackRabbit),
> > > > > basically I want to be able to be able to persist the workflow (and
> > > > > its
> > > > > state) in the content repository. Am I right in thinking that I
> > > > > would need
> > > > > to develop a jsr170 dao layer. Is this feasable and is there
> > > > > someone out
> > > > > there who is already doing it ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Harvey
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to