Hi, On Nov 27, 2007 11:41 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But reading the process definition, plink.foo is confusing, I can't just by > reading determing if it's invoking or receiving without also digging into > the operation definition. And me/partner is just another way of saying > receive/invoke, so why not say it directly? Ok, agreed :) The last one in Matthieu's mail look definitely promising as it's pretty close to original BPEL look&feel (receive() and invoke()).
What do you think about the partnerLink declaration? We thought about something like that: partnerLink plink = [type = ns1::plType, myRole = rolea, partnerRole = roleb, init = true]; // init defaults to false Cheers, Tammo, Olly -- Tammo van Lessen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.taval.de
