On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Even if 1.1.2 is never released, having a branch using a SNAPSHOT version
> when
> the version has already been released sounds weird to me ;-)
>

True, I actually hadn't even noticed until now :) Anyway, fixed.


>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Btw, the branch is still labelled 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT ?
> > > Souldn't it be 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT instead ?
> > >
> >
> > Actually we hadn't decided on a 1.1.2 yet, we were more gearing toward
> > 1.2.
> > But given that 1.2 is still about a couple months away. it's maybe time
> to
> > start seriously thinking of a 1.1.2.
> >
> > Matthieu
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Gianfranco Boccalon <
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > when a new version of ODE will be released ?
> > > > > I'm using ODE within ServiceMix, but with SMX 3.2.1 it doesn't
> work
> > > (as
> > > > > you already know) and I have some difficulties building it from
> > > sources.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I was actually wondering whether we should do another incremental
> > 1.1.2
> > > > release, we have a few fixes there that are valuable. But for the
> > > support
> > > > of
> > > > more recent ServiceMix versions, I believe it's only been
> implemented
> > in
> > > > another branch which would be 1.2 and isn't ready yet for prime time
> > > > (probably needs a couple more months).
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Matthieu
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Gianfranco
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > ------------------------
> > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>

Reply via email to