On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:07 PM, <m...@silodev.eu> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have question about BOM and O-Model. > Do you refer to BOM as "BPEL object model", and to executable intermediate > format as "O-Model"? >
Correct. The BOM is actually closer to an AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) used only for BPEL parsing, it's only needed by the ODE compiler. > > If so, how can I extend the O-Model name? Isn't the O standing for "Object" > What do you mean by extend it? > And would it end up in > 1) BOM == "BPEL object model" > 2) O-Model == "object model" > > Am I correct? > Yes, those acronyms are actually not very descriptive if you don't know what they are beforehand. Matthieu > > PS > Maybe I can refer O-Model as "process model"? > > Thanks in advance, > Madars > >
