Hi Matthieu, I was thinking for what does this [O]-Model stands for. And now I see that in full form it is Object-Model.
Thanks, Madars > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:07 PM, <m...@silodev.eu> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have question about BOM and O-Model. >> Do you refer to BOM as "BPEL object model", and to executable >> intermediate >> format as "O-Model"? >> > > Correct. The BOM is actually closer to an AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) used > only for BPEL parsing, it's only needed by the ODE compiler. > > >> >> If so, how can I extend the O-Model name? Isn't the O standing for >> "Object" >> > > What do you mean by extend it? > > >> And would it end up in >> 1) BOM == "BPEL object model" >> 2) O-Model == "object model" >> >> Am I correct? >> > > Yes, those acronyms are actually not very descriptive if you don't know > what > they are beforehand. > > Matthieu > > >> >> PS >> Maybe I can refer O-Model as "process model"? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Madars >> >> >
