Hi Tammo, I thought to use WKA implement the cluster, not multicast or aws. What do you think?
On 20 May 2015 at 11:17, sudharma subasinghe <suba...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: > Hi Tammo, > > > Yes, I agree with you. So I will use hazelcast.xml to configure. > > Thank you > Sudharma > > On 19 May 2015 at 16:25, Tammo van Lessen <tvanles...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Sudharma, >> >> is this your own configuration file schema? What about just using the >> standard hazelcast.xml for the configuration and loading it from >> WEB-INF/conf? This would enable uses to use all hazelcast features (e.g. >> EC2 auto discovery) and we don't need to replicate to configuration >> documentation for the cluster config. WDYT? >> >> Best, >> Tammo >> >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:54 AM, sudharma subasinghe < >> suba...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >> >>> This is the structure of cluster config file. It uses static >>> configuration >>> >>> <clusterconfig enabled=true> >>> <membershipScheme>wka</membershipScheme> >>> >>> <!-- The host name or IP address of this member --> >>> <localMemberHost>127.0.0.1</localMemberHost> >>> >>> <!-- The TCP port of this member --> >>> <localMemberPort>4000</localMemberPort> >>> >>> <!-- The list of static or well-known members --> >>> <members> >>> <member> >>> <hostName>127.0.0.1</hostName> >>> <port>4000</port> >>> </member> >>> <member> >>> <hostName>127.0.0.2</hostName> >>> <port>4001</port> >>> </member> >>> <member> >>> <hostName>127.0.0.3</hostName> >>> <port>4002</port> >>> </member> >>> </members> >>> </clusterconfig> >>> >>> Thank you >>> >>> >>> On 18 May 2015 at 22:17, Nandika Jayawardana <jayaw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> In axis2, clustering implementation supports both WKA ( well known >>>> address >>>> based clustering ) and multicast. However, in most cases, its the well >>>> known address based method that is used in production setups. Hence, I >>>> think its better to implement well known address based method. Can you >>>> post >>>> your configuration file and the hazelcast based api design. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Nandika >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:16 PM, sudharma subasinghe < >>>> suba...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > This is my plan on implementing ODE clustering using hazelcast. I >>>> thought >>>> > to use a static configuration. Each node has a config file which >>>> stores >>>> > hostName and port number of each node in the cluster. So each node is >>>> aware >>>> > of other nodes in the cluster and when a node start up it will join >>>> to the >>>> > cluster. Please give me ideas on this. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > Sudharma >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de >> > >
