Hi, I created a new project module called ode-clustering and created a package called hazelcast under that for cluster implementation. I will follow what you said in implementation.
Thank you. Sudharma On 25 May 2015 at 11:32, Sathwik B P <sathwik...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sudharma, > > The bridge between IL and Runtime is through interfaces. > > Look towards defining the interfaces for clustering component under module > bpel-api. > > Initialize your clustering component in ODEServer and pass it on to the > BPELServerImpl through the org.apache.ode.bpel.engine.Contexts > > > Tammo, > > Shouldn't we create a new project module called ode-cluster-hazelcast for > clustering implementation ? > > regards, > sathwik > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 4:56 PM, sudharma subasinghe < > suba...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> > wrote: > > > Hi Tammo, > > > > Yes, it is just a configuration option. I thought put clustering code in > a > > separate package and then call it from BpelServerImpl class or ODEServer > > class. What would be the appropriate class? > > > > Thank you. > > > > On 21 May 2015 at 11:40, Tammo van Lessen <tvanles...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Sudharma, > > > > > > I think it is a good starting point to only use WKA, however, why do we > > > need to restrict the approach to that? Isn't this just a configuration > > > option for hazelcast and any ODE user may choose the approach they like > > > once the feature is finished? > > > > > > Best, > > > Tammo > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:54 AM, sudharma subasinghe < > > > suba...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Tammo, > > >> > > >> I thought to use WKA implement the cluster, not multicast or aws. What > > do > > >> you think? > > >> > > >> On 20 May 2015 at 11:17, sudharma subasinghe <suba...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi Tammo, > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Yes, I agree with you. So I will use hazelcast.xml to configure. > > >>> > > >>> Thank you > > >>> Sudharma > > >>> > > >>> On 19 May 2015 at 16:25, Tammo van Lessen <tvanles...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi Sudharma, > > >>>> > > >>>> is this your own configuration file schema? What about just using > the > > >>>> standard hazelcast.xml for the configuration and loading it from > > >>>> WEB-INF/conf? This would enable uses to use all hazelcast features > > (e.g. > > >>>> EC2 auto discovery) and we don't need to replicate to configuration > > >>>> documentation for the cluster config. WDYT? > > >>>> > > >>>> Best, > > >>>> Tammo > > >>>> > > >>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:54 AM, sudharma subasinghe < > > >>>> suba...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> This is the structure of cluster config file. It uses static > > >>>>> configuration > > >>>>> > > >>>>> <clusterconfig enabled=true> > > >>>>> <membershipScheme>wka</membershipScheme> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> <!-- The host name or IP address of this member --> > > >>>>> <localMemberHost>127.0.0.1</localMemberHost> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> <!-- The TCP port of this member --> > > >>>>> <localMemberPort>4000</localMemberPort> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> <!-- The list of static or well-known members --> > > >>>>> <members> > > >>>>> <member> > > >>>>> <hostName>127.0.0.1</hostName> > > >>>>> <port>4000</port> > > >>>>> </member> > > >>>>> <member> > > >>>>> <hostName>127.0.0.2</hostName> > > >>>>> <port>4001</port> > > >>>>> </member> > > >>>>> <member> > > >>>>> <hostName>127.0.0.3</hostName> > > >>>>> <port>4002</port> > > >>>>> </member> > > >>>>> </members> > > >>>>> </clusterconfig> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thank you > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 18 May 2015 at 22:17, Nandika Jayawardana <jayaw...@gmail.com> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> In axis2, clustering implementation supports both WKA ( well known > > >>>>>> address > > >>>>>> based clustering ) and multicast. However, in most cases, its the > > well > > >>>>>> known address based method that is used in production setups. > > Hence, I > > >>>>>> think its better to implement well known address based method. Can > > >>>>>> you post > > >>>>>> your configuration file and the hazelcast based api design. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Regards > > >>>>>> Nandika > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:16 PM, sudharma subasinghe < > > >>>>>> suba...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > Hi, > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > This is my plan on implementing ODE clustering using hazelcast. > I > > >>>>>> thought > > >>>>>> > to use a static configuration. Each node has a config file which > > >>>>>> stores > > >>>>>> > hostName and port number of each node in the cluster. So each > node > > >>>>>> is aware > > >>>>>> > of other nodes in the cluster and when a node start up it will > > join > > >>>>>> to the > > >>>>>> > cluster. Please give me ideas on this. > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > Thanks, > > >>>>>> > Sudharma > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de > > > > > >
