Jacques,

I think that this is a special situation in which a smapshot of dbcp is required (not a release version).

Jacopo

Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Should we not use a version number (1.3) for dbcp ? I w'd be happy to do it if 
needed.

Jacques

Author: jacopoc
Date: Wed Oct 31 03:56:52 2007
New Revision: 590620

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=590620&view=rev
Log:
Fixed path to commons-dbcp

Modified:
    ofbiz/trunk/.classpath

Modified: ofbiz/trunk/.classpath
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/.classpath?rev=590620&r1=590619&r2=590620&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- ofbiz/trunk/.classpath (original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/.classpath Wed Oct 31 03:56:52 2007
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
  <classpathentry kind="lib" 
path="framework/base/lib/commons/commons-el-1.0.jar"/>
  <classpathentry kind="lib" 
path="framework/base/lib/commons/commons-discovery-0.4.jar"/>
  <classpathentry kind="lib" 
path="framework/base/lib/commons/commons-digester-1.8.jar"/>
- <classpathentry kind="lib" 
path="framework/base/lib/commons/commons-dbcp-1.2.2.jar"/>
+ <classpathentry kind="lib" 
path="framework/entity/lib/commons-dbcp-20070730.jar"/>
  <classpathentry kind="lib" 
path="framework/base/lib/commons/commons-collections-3.2.jar"/>
  <classpathentry kind="lib" 
path="framework/base/lib/commons/commons-codec-1.3.jar"/>
  <classpathentry kind="lib" 
path="framework/base/lib/commons/commons-cli-1.0.jar"/>



Reply via email to