Hi Paul, this is only a minor point for me, it just saves one folder/structure level.
If we want to stay open for other documentation frameworks in the future, it might be better to keep the proposed structure.
Best regards, Michael Am 28.01.18 um 02:54 schrieb Paul Foxworthy:
On 26 January 2018 at 19:53, Michael Brohl <[email protected]> wrote:with a small modification: I don't think we'll need a two-folder structure /docs/asciidoc, only /docs should be sufficient, no?Hi Michael, We have streamlined the build system in other places by having folders for the source language: groovyScripts, minilang, src/main/java . It means Groovy and other build tools can have default rules for what to do with the contents of a language folder, and allows for the possibility of other languages in future if necessary. The extra layer is only a minor nuisance. I think I'd prefer to keep it. What do you see as the disadvantages? Cheers Paul Foxworthy
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
