+1 Aman, PartyAcctgPreference looks good to me. This will give the
flexibility to control accounting on Company party level.

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Aman, Rishi,
>
> Why not have both?
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
> Le 03/05/2018 à 08:40, Rishi Solanki a écrit :
>
>> Hi Aman,
>> +1 for making it configurable.
>>
>> By PartyAcctgPreference.enableAccounting flag you mean for an OFBiz
>> instance if flag is enable then for that company/organization accounting
>> transactions recorded otherwise not. That also mean, for an instance we
>> may
>> record the accounting transaction for one organization and do not record
>> accounting transaction for other organization.
>>
>> This is something I couldn't imagine in real world business scenario. So
>> big +1 for making it configurable but not sure about weather we should go
>> for PartyAcctgPreference or may consider SystemProperty for that.
>>
>> Looking for others input, BTW, no objection on using PartyAcctgPreference
>> but thinking if it is useful to add checks/efforts for organizations over
>> same instance.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rishi Solanki
>> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
>> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
>> Direct: +91-9893287847
>> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
>> www.hotwax.co
>>
>> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Aman Agrawal <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>>
>>> In current flow, if we want to disable the accounting then we need to
>>> disable the set of seca's. We don't have any configurable setting to
>>> disable accounting.
>>> So, I have a proposal to make accounting transaction entries
>>> configurable.
>>> We can manage this by adding a new field 'enableAccounting' in the
>>> 'PartyAcctgPreference' entity. Accounting transaction entries will be
>>> entertained accordingly.
>>>
>>> Thanks and regards,
>>> *Aman Agrawal*
>>> Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer
>>> www.hotwaxsystems.com
>>> www.hotwax.co
>>>
>>>
>


-- 

Thanks & Regards
---
Arun Patidar
Director of Information SystemsHotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/>

Reply via email to