Hi Jacques, Now subscribed with [email protected]
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Arun Patidar <[email protected] > wrote: > Thanks Jacques, this is a typo. I should use [email protected] email > address in reply. > > > Thanks & Regards > --- > Arun Patidar > Director of Information SystemsHotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co> > > > > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:08 PM Jacques Le Roux < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Arun, > > > > This email address [email protected] is not subscribed (typo?) > > > > Jacques > > > > > > Le 03/05/2018 à 09:40, Arun Patidar a écrit : > > > +1 Aman, PartyAcctgPreference looks good to me. This will give the > > > flexibility to control accounting on Company party level. > > > > > > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Aman, Rishi, > > >> > > >> Why not have both? > > >> > > >> Jacques > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Le 03/05/2018 à 08:40, Rishi Solanki a écrit : > > >> > > >>> Hi Aman, > > >>> +1 for making it configurable. > > >>> > > >>> By PartyAcctgPreference.enableAccounting flag you mean for an OFBiz > > >>> instance if flag is enable then for that company/organization > > accounting > > >>> transactions recorded otherwise not. That also mean, for an instance > we > > >>> may > > >>> record the accounting transaction for one organization and do not > > record > > >>> accounting transaction for other organization. > > >>> > > >>> This is something I couldn't imagine in real world business scenario. > > So > > >>> big +1 for making it configurable but not sure about weather we > should > > go > > >>> for PartyAcctgPreference or may consider SystemProperty for that. > > >>> > > >>> Looking for others input, BTW, no objection on using > > PartyAcctgPreference > > >>> but thinking if it is useful to add checks/efforts for organizations > > over > > >>> same instance. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Rishi Solanki > > >>> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > > >>> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > > >>> Direct: +91-9893287847 > > >>> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > > >>> www.hotwax.co > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Aman Agrawal < > > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hello, > > >>>> In current flow, if we want to disable the accounting then we need > to > > >>>> disable the set of seca's. We don't have any configurable setting to > > >>>> disable accounting. > > >>>> So, I have a proposal to make accounting transaction entries > > >>>> configurable. > > >>>> We can manage this by adding a new field 'enableAccounting' in the > > >>>> 'PartyAcctgPreference' entity. Accounting transaction entries will > be > > >>>> entertained accordingly. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks and regards, > > >>>> *Aman Agrawal* > > >>>> Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer > > >>>> www.hotwaxsystems.com > > >>>> www.hotwax.co > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > > -- Thanks & Regards --- Arun Patidar Director of Information SystemsHotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/>
