Hi All

I really like the idea of making AR and AP plugins. I’ve taken a quick look and 
from what I can see all of the functionality in them are just specialised 
filters of what is already available in the accounting menu.

It looks like our accounting module was originally created with all possible 
accounting functions combined into one module so we have  GL, AR, AP etc 
already all included as part of accounting. 

Many users are used to having an accounting module with the accounting 
functions broken down into specialist submodules  and if people can’t see or 
find them easily they don’t think they exist so I can understand why the AR and 
AP applications were added. That being said – why keep this type of duplication 
in our framework? I think this is something that could be optional and so more 
useful as a plugin.

Having different implementations of base functionality is exactly where the 
plugins could help us give users what they are looking.

Thanks
Sharan

On 2018/09/03 08:11:26, Jacopo Cappellato <[email protected]> 
wrote: 
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 2:09 PM Nicolas Malin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > After analyze the webapp accounting AR and accounting AP, I didn't see
> > any logic to keep them on the functional framework. The main webapp is
> > accounting, AP/AR are a business orientation that we can load at demand
> > through plugins.
> >
> > Your opinion ?
> >
> 
> As far as I remember, the AP/AR web applications were created as a
> specialized versions of the user interfaces for some business processes
> (account receivables and account payables related tasks) that were already
> available in the more general "accounting" web application. I like the idea
> to move them to plugins but, as mentioned by Taher, we should also verify
> if there are specific features that are available only in the AP/AR version
> and not in the "accounting" application: if we find some, then we should
> migrate the basic artifacts to the main "accounting" app and then move the
> specialized screens to plugins. I think such cases will be rare but one
> possible candidate is the "batch payment" functionality of the AR app.
> 
> 
> >
> > PS: In the same idea we can move on separate plugin all thirdparty
> > accounting element to slimdown the accounting component and must harness
> > the plugin system :)
> >
> 
> +1
> 
> Jacopo
> 
> 
> >
> > Nicolas
> >
> >
> 

Reply via email to