+1
Le 22/09/2018 à 14:15, Deepak Nigam a écrit :
IMO, here the relation type should be 'one' here to maintain the referential integrity. WDYT?
+1
Le 22/09/2018 à 14:15, Deepak Nigam a écrit :
IMO, here the relation type should be 'one' here to maintain the referential integrity. WDYT?