Indeed, thanks Deepak
This is from pre Apache era by David.
I finally see no harm keeping it as is.
Jacques
Le 25/09/2018 à 11:07, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
It looks good to have one FK relationship while reviewing entity def found
following description. This is by design before proceeding we need to check
this.
"Defines a permission available to a security group; there is no FK to
SecurityPermission because we want to leave open the possibility of ad-hoc
permissions, especially for the Entity Data Maintenance pages which have
TONS of permissions"
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
2018-09-25 14:21 GMT+05:30 Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]>:
+1
Jacques
Le 24/09/2018 à 08:28, Julien NICOLAS a écrit :
+1
Le 22/09/2018 à 14:15, Deepak Nigam a écrit :
IMO, here the relation type should be 'one' here to maintain
the referential integrity. WDYT?
