Matthieu,
Le 13/06/2019 à 14:08, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
Hello Deepak,
Deepak Dixit <[email protected]> writes:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:14 PM Mathieu Lirzin <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello Aditya,
Aditya Sharma <[email protected]> writes:
> We can configure reply-to email address for the mailing list which means
> when the user clicks the reply button, the specified email address will be
> automatically in the *To* field.
I know some people here prefer their personal email address to not
appear in the ‘To’ header when replying to them and the mailing-list but
that's a personnal preference that can/should be defined only by the
sender of a message not the administrators of a mailing-list. [1]
Please configure your email client to add the ‘Reply-to’ header
accordingly, but let others have different preferences. :-)
I think if we are doing communication on the mailing list, its good to
have mailing list address in reply-to irrespective personal
preference. We can ask infra for the same.
I will answer to you by using a citation from
<http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Some administrators justify Reply-To munging by saying, "All responses
should go directly to the list anyway." This is arrogant. You should
allow me to decide exactly how I wish to respond to a message. If I feel
a public response is justified, I'll hit the "g" key and tell Elm to do
a group-reply. If I believe a private response is more appropriate, I'll
use "r" to send one. Please allow me the freedom to decide how to handle
a message.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Please read the arguments provided by this short article. I hope it will
let you understand the drawbacks of what you are proposing.
Thanks.
Then we should ask what Infra was doing before and discuss about it.
I hope that we will find a consensus and in the process discover why this
changed recently. I like the way it worked so far
Jacques
