Hello Deepak, Deepak Dixit <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:14 PM Mathieu Lirzin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello Aditya, > > Aditya Sharma <[email protected]> writes: > > > We can configure reply-to email address for the mailing list which means > > when the user clicks the reply button, the specified email address will be > > automatically in the *To* field. > > I know some people here prefer their personal email address to not > appear in the ‘To’ header when replying to them and the mailing-list but > that's a personnal preference that can/should be defined only by the > sender of a message not the administrators of a mailing-list. [1] > > Please configure your email client to add the ‘Reply-to’ header > accordingly, but let others have different preferences. :-) > > I think if we are doing communication on the mailing list, its good to > have mailing list address in reply-to irrespective personal > preference. We can ask infra for the same. I will answer to you by using a citation from <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Some administrators justify Reply-To munging by saying, "All responses should go directly to the list anyway." This is arrogant. You should allow me to decide exactly how I wish to respond to a message. If I feel a public response is justified, I'll hit the "g" key and tell Elm to do a group-reply. If I believe a private response is more appropriate, I'll use "r" to send one. Please allow me the freedom to decide how to handle a message. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Please read the arguments provided by this short article. I hope it will let you understand the drawbacks of what you are proposing. Thanks. -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
