Awesome, it works again. Very cool. On Thu, Jul 18, 2019, 10:13 PM Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Aditya, > > Jacques > > Le 18/07/2019 à 14:59, Aditya Sharma a écrit : > > Here is the Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18768 > > > > Thanks and regards, > > Aditya Sharma > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 5:39 PM Aditya Sharma <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> I went through the post shared by Mathieu, Jacques along with this > post[1] > >> that shows both the sides vividly and it all makes sense. > >> Different people may have different preferences for it but we have to > >> choose what favors the community. > >> I can see many instances on lists where users replied to the personal > >> email and we cannot really restrict anyone to use reply or reply-all. > >> I will create a Jira at infra so that previous arrangement is restored. > >> > >> 1. https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html > >> > >> Thanks and regards, > >> Aditya Sharma > >> > >> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 8:23 PM Jacques Le Roux < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Le 30/06/2019 à 16:08, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : > >>>> Hello Jacques > >>>> > >>>> Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> writes: > >>>> > >>>>> The question is should we vote? > >>>>> > >>>>> So far it all depends on me and my -0.2 added to Paul's -0.8 after > >>>>> Mathieu convinced me that it would be better do to otherwise. > >>>>> > >>>>> If Mathieu does not want to use his veto, I'll not apply mine. It was > >>>>> like that for years and it seems everybody was happy, including > >>>>> Mathieu, Paul and I, we never complained. > >>>> I am not familiar with Apache voting policies, However according to > [1] > >>>> it seems that people are not expected to use their veto for procedural > >>>> issues. > >>>> > >>>> Most people in this conversation have already expressed their opinion > in > >>>> favour of the ‘reply-to’ munging and have not been convinced by my > >>>> arguments, so I don't think we need to formally vote. > >>>> > >>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > >>> That's simpler indeed. We could argue that it's code and a vote could > be > >>> done. But it's not OFBiz code so I I guess it would be far fetched and > most > >>> would not agree. > >>> > >>> Anyway, I'll continue to use Reply-to-list, and we will not receive > >>> unwanted copies, it's OK with me. > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> > >>> >
