I didn't mean any disrespect, my apologies Mathieu. My email was written
out of frustration that something worked well for many years and suddenly
changed for the worse (in my opinion).
Regards
Scott
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 20:13, Mathieu Lirzin <mathieu.lir...@nereide.fr>
wrote:
> Scott Gray <scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com> writes:
>
> > I just did it as well and it's super annoying. I don't ever want to
> > directly reply to messages on our lists, at least without some manual
> > effort on my part. Personally I couldn't care less about whether or not
> > some idealists think setting reply-to is harmful.
>
> Should I say then that I don't care about people who don't want to make
> the effort of configuring and using an email client properly? Let us not
> go that path and be respectful to each other.
>
> This topic has nothing to do with “idealism”, it is just about adopting
> some practical and safe conventions.
>
> I acknowledge that your current habits makes things impractical for you,
> since you were expecting "reply" to mean "reply to {list,group,all}" but
> to me this is just confusing.
>
> --
> Mathieu Lirzin
> GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
>
