Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> writes: > Le 11/03/2020 à 12:33, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : >> Yes things seems to happen not magically but by putting earplugs on and >> going ahead, which is certainly more effective but IMO not acceptable >> when working within a community. > > I'm not sure to who it's destined, so I'll not take it for me :)
This was destined to no-one, it was just general remark regarding handling community input on a proposal. So you do not have to feel targeted. By the way the expression “not acceptable” was probably too strong and should have been “not a good thing” because as Pierre said this is eventually necessary to get things done. >> The simple solution to prevent this is to get into the habit of >> linearizing history, meaning always rebasing and clean history before >> merging into trunk. > > I guess the GH merge button option "Rebase and merge" is what we are > looking to enforce with the request to Infra, right? I personnally think we should have *no button* because the committers should cleanup the commits (reword, squash, ...) before merging to trunk, but "rebase and merge" is an improvement compared to basic "merge". -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
