Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> writes: > Le 11/03/2020 à 17:08, Michael Brohl a écrit : >> >> Am 11.03.20 um 16:29 schrieb Mathieu Lirzin: >>> - Adopt Github Pull Request (PR) as the unique channel for code contribution >> >> -1 >> >> I don't see a reason why we should not allow patches also. It will >> make it easier for people to contribute who are not able (or >> willing) to run their own GitHub repository. >> >> We should encourage people to use PR's but not force it (at least, not >> immediately...). > > I agree with Michael, using only GitHub (GH) is too radical, IMO even in the > future. > > Also the Jacopo's remark about using (only?) a 3rd party tool should > be checked if ever we get this way. Jira is also a 3rd party tool but > it's donated by Atlassian to the ASF and handled/customised/maintained > by the Infra team. Also it uses a customised version of the OFBiz > Entity Engine, own dog food? :) > [...] > +1 with Michael's comment, Jira is very handy when it comes to details > like uploading info, etc. Not sure GH provides the same >
If seasoned PMC members like you or Michael are not ready to give up on considering JIRA as a central tool to “manage” every code contribution the discussion is over on my side. Adopting the Github Workflow ontop of an already indigest cake of contribution requirements can only make things worse. -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
