that does not look like my patch.
mine has an uppcase in it.

David E Jones sent the following on 12/18/2007 10:19 AM:
> 1. Bad code formating
> 2. Makes the default true, is that what we really want?
> 3. If 2 is true then should use more compact and easy to read,
> like if != false instead of if = true
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:37:55 -0000
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
>> Author: jleroux
>> Date: Tue Dec 18 03:37:47 2007
>> New Revision: 605186
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=605186&view=rev
>> Log:
>> A patch from BJ Freeman "Allows better testing of testmode from
>> propties file of
>> authorize.net" (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1450) -
>> OFBIZ-1450
>>
>> Modified:
>>     
>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/thirdparty/authorizedotnet/AIMPaymentServices.java
>>
>> Modified:
>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/thirdparty/authorizedotnet/AIMPaymentServices.java
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/thirdparty/authorizedotnet/AIMPaymentServices.java?rev=605186&r1=605185&r2=605186&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> ---
>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/thirdparty/authorizedotnet/AIMPaymentServices.java
>> (original) +++
>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/thirdparty/authorizedotnet/AIMPaymentServices.java
>> Tue Dec 18 03:37:47 2007 @@ -376,7 +376,15 @@ } private static
>> boolean isTestMode() {
>> -         return ("TRUE".equals((String)
>> AIMProperties.get("testReq"))); 
>> +       boolean ret = true;
>> +        String testReq = (String)AIMProperties.get("testReq");
>> +        if(testReq != null) {
>> +            if(testReq.equals("TRUE"))
>> +                ret = true;
>> +            else
>> +                ret = false;
>> +        }
>> +        return ret;
>>      }
>>  
>>      private static String getVersion() {
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to