Yes, I think that the Skip Menu is something that could be useful even to people not impaired but particulary "affetionated" to the keyboard and to DOS applications.
One more thing to consider in the layout best practice is the hiding of every menu command that is not available due to the actual user permission. We have had a thread about this in this ML and I think we should put it in this best practice list also. -Bruno 2008/6/2 Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The basic idea is to have a Skip Menu button very early in the page, so > that sight impaired users can tab to that button, hit Enter, and jump over > all of the main and sub navigation to go directly to the main content. > > By the way, when you are testing OFBiz's accessibility, you don't have to > close your eyes - just turn your monitor off and hide your mouse. ;-) > > > -Adrian > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> Adrian, >> >> This is great, I would like to have a look at the Skip Menu button, hope I >> will find time (I'm willing to do too much things at the same time these >> last times and I do just a few of them) >> >> Thanks >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Adrian Crum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> In the UI work I've done, I have tried to keep accessibility an important >>> priority. One of the things I like about having a scalable UI is that sight >>> impaired people can crank up their browser's default font to see it better. >>> The simplified markup is great for screen readers. Keeping OFBiz accessible >>> to the blind is one reason why I want the screen widgets to output plain >>> HTML in addition to all the new, fancy Ajax stuff. >>> >>> I agree we're doing pretty well. The only thing we're missing is a "Skip >>> Menus" button at the top of the screen. >>> >>> -Adrian >>> >>> Jacques Le Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: "Jacques Le >>> Roux" >>> >>>> From: "Bruno Busco" >>>> >>> >>> [...] >>>> >>>>> Another point that I would bring into this discussion (hoping not being >>>>> OT) >>>>> is the possibility for the user to easily use the page with the >>>>> keyboard >>>>> only and still be able to switch between search fields panel and the >>>>> data >>>>> table to refine the search. >>>>> I have noticed that many end-users that use non-web based application >>>>> go >>>>> very fast in data entry with the keyboard only and this, in my opinion, >>>>> should be considered in the OFBiz interface desing. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, I agree this is a very pertinent remark (we could even think more >>>> about the 15% of the population which is more or less >>>> disabled, and sadly underemployed from this cause. In France for >>>> instance there are laws for decades about that but still a lot of >>>> enterprises which prefer to pay taxes than to employ handicapped >>>> persons...) >>>> >>> >>> Mmm... That saids, I though one hour ago that it's should be a huge task >>> for an ERP UI... Then I dowloaded Webbie >>> http://www.webbie.org.uk/ and NVDA >>> http://www.nvda-project.org/download.html (awesome for a free tool). >>> Sorry these softwares are >>> designed for Windows but I guess the same exists on Linux >>> >>> And you know what ? I think OFBIz is not doing too bad. Of course we >>> could do better by adding means to skip some parts of the >>> screens, but it's really not too bad. >>> >>> Ok, I let my screen open and I did not close my eyes. But I'm pretty sure >>> OFBiz is not so hard to use for a blind person with some >>> experience with computer and web tools designed for blinds (and of course >>> some guidances for OFBiz at start too, I remember now my >>> 1st steps in OFBIz). Good news isn'it ? >>> >>> Of course this is seen from a non blind person and I can't guarantee it's >>> realistic... Maybe in some decades, centuries ? >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> Jacques >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>>> -Bruno >>>>> >>>>> 2008/6/1 Adrian Crum : >>>>> >>>>> I know the two subjects were mixed in some replies. I understand what >>>>>> you >>>>>> mean though. ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>> >>>>>> Scott Gray wrote: I was for separating create forms >>>>>> and search/result forms, I was not >>>>>> suggesting that we should separate the search forms themselves. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Scott >>>>>> >>>>>> 2008/6/1 Jacques Le Roux : >>>>>> >>>>>> > I finally agree with most too (I mean I agree with Adrian's >>>>>> proposition >>>>>> and >>>>>> > Andrew's here). Having them on 2 screen was a Scott's >>>>>> > proposition that I agreed with because of the flexibility given by >>>>>> modern >>>>>> > browsers and their integrated tabs capabilities. But I can >>>>>> > imagine that some people, especially end users, would not like to >>>>>> use >>>>>> tabs >>>>>> > or even a modern browser (though they should to use >>>>>> > both). Then it's obviously not easier to use... >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Just one point : I'm not sure it's good to have forms collapsed by >>>>>> default >>>>>> > when there are results. If we would really want to have >>>>>> > something like that, whe should at least have an indicator to let >>>>>> know >>>>>> the >>>>>> > user that the list is not empty. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Just my opinion, and BTW having a consensual standard usage will be >>>>>> great. >>>>>> > I agree with the idea that we really need to standardise our ways of >>>>>> doing >>>>>> > things, even if there are only a few places still needing it in >>>>>> OFBiz ERP >>>>>> > (thanks to widgets for instance) >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Jacques >>>>>> > >>>>>> > From: "Andrew Zeneski" >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I can agree with most except list results and the form should be >>>>>> rendered >>>>>> >> as one screen. This is to make usage easier when the >>>>>> >> user wants to change the search parameters. Having the form >>>>>> collapsed >>>>>> by >>>>>> >> default when there are results is good. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Andrew >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On May 30, 2008, at 12:16 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Getting back to this... >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Here are the layout best practices discussed so far: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> "In the case where items are being added to a list, it is >>>>>> preferable >>>>>> to >>>>>> >>> have the item data entry screen and the item list on >>>>>> >>> separate screens. If the two functions are incorporated into one >>>>>> screen, >>>>>> >>> then the item data entry screen should be above the >>>>>> >>> item list. In addition, the item data entry screen should be >>>>>> collapsible >>>>>> >>> and initially collapsed." >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> "If a Find Item screen has a form for search options, the search >>>>>> options >>>>>> >>> form should be above the list of items found. The list >>>>>> >>> of items found should display all items initially - giving the >>>>>> user >>>>>> the >>>>>> >>> ability to narrow the results via the search options >>>>>> >>> form." >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Can we agree on these? >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> -Adrian >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>> From: "Scott Gray" >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>> It looks nice but if we did that the user would lose the ability >>>>>> to >>>>>> >>>>> refer >>>>>> >>>>> back to the list while entering data, I would prefer an expand/ >>>>>> >>>>> collapse form >>>>>> >>>>> if we are going to keep them on the same page. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>> Yes I agree, but I really like the idea for the calendar (I can't >>>>>> >>>> propose it for lookups are they are too much to be loaded >>>>>> >>>> when lauching and the probability of use is far more low, but >>>>>> maybe >>>>>> one >>>>>> >>>> day, when machines will be more powerful :D >>>>>> >>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>> Scott >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> 2008/5/24 Anil Patel : >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I think what David is suggesting is something like this >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.wildbit.com/demos/modalbox/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> Anil Patel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On May 23, 2008, at 1:57 PM, David E Jones wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I didn't say open a new window, I said either expand a hidden >>>>>> area >>>>>> >>>>>>> or >>>>>> >>>>>>> popup using JavaScript within the window (ie over top of the >>>>>> list >>>>>> >>>>>>> behind >>>>>> >>>>>>> it). >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> -David >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On May 23, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> IMHO, we should avoid to overuse popping as opening a new >>>>>> window >>>>>> is >>>>>> >>>>>>> time >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> consuming (especially in Firefox). This is currently a major >>>>>> >>>>>>>> inconvenience >>>>>> >>>>>>>> for Lookups and Calendar for instance >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: "David E Jones" >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Since we're entering the world of using more javascript in >>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> browser, >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> why not have the add form on the top but hidden by default >>>>>> with >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and Add >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> button of some sort that would cause the form to be shown? >>>>>> We >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> could even >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> make it fancy and popup over top of the list form and have >>>>>> it >>>>>> go >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> away after >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> submission with an update of the list behind it... without >>>>>> any >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> page loads >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> even. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -David >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2008, at 11:38 PM, Scott Gray wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I would agree with that but personally I would prefer to see >>>>>> them >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> on >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> completely different pages. If I wanted to be able to >>>>>> refer >>>>>> back >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> list while adding I would ctrl+click and then ctrl+tab to >>>>>> flick >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> back >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> forth, that's what makes tabbed browsers so handy. One of >>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> problems with >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> having them on the same page is that any errors after >>>>>> adding >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> displayed before the list while the add form would be way >>>>>> down >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> bottom. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Scott >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2008/5/23 David E Jones : >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2008, at 9:11 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) If a screen has a list and add form, what should be the >>>>>> order >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> these >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> forms (I have seen in your recent work that add form >>>>>> should >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> come on >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> top >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I completely >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> agree with this). >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe the form should be on top of the list. >>>>>> Otherwise, >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> as you >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> add >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> items to the list, the form is scrolled off the bottom of >>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> screen. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The main question is: what is going to be used more? >>>>>> Will it >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> be the >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> list or >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> the add form? >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If in most cases it will be the list, and if you have to >>>>>> scroll >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> down >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> every >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> time to see it... that's a pain. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -David >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>
