On Jul 15, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Jacopo,
I agree for the BI component. But my concern is about the other one,
namely org.ofbiz that I had to re-add (I put it in AssetMaint
as a quick fix). Do we need it because it's in specialpurpose ? Or
do we need at least one of each existing entity groups ?
From http://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/ofbiz/?cs=672821&@csTruncateDiffs=false
(expand all) It thought it was no longer
needed. That's why I removed all ot them (but BI) and found this
"anomaly" (if it's one).
Ah sorry, now I see what you mean. I shouldn't really need that file,
I agree... I will have a look if I find a free slot.
Jacques
PS : BTW, please could you email certificate I got issues each time
I open one of yours :o)
L'adresse de messagerie de l'identificateur numérique ne
correspond pas à celle de l'expéditeur
Signataire : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Expéditeur : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
I am sorry for this... I will check my certificate again.
Cheers,
Jacopo
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Jacques,
we need that one, and in general having the ability to specify a
non default entity group thru the entitygroup.xml file is
something very useful and that we need to keep.
So the one in the BI component is really needed and also a good
example of how entity groups are associated to entities.
I mean that the entitygroup.xml files are not deprecated...
Jacopo
On Jul 15, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I had a look, but I have no time anymore, any ideas ?
I would like to get completly rid of... But what was it
already ?... I can't remember... Doh...
Thanks
Jacques
