Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Reverted in revision: 707830 > > Obviously Adam's solution would be far better.
I'd like to talk about this and other changes I'd like to do, at the upcoming conference.
Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Reverted in revision: 707830 > > Obviously Adam's solution would be far better.
I'd like to talk about this and other changes I'd like to do, at the upcoming conference.