I hope a summary of the discussion gets fed back here so those not going can be kept in the loop. :D
Adam Heath sent the following on 10/25/2008 11:58 AM: > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> Reverted in revision: 707830 >> >> Obviously Adam's solution would be far better. > > I'd like to talk about this and other changes I'd like to do, at the > upcoming conference. > >
