Re: Comment to : http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview

[Vikas Mayur]

+1

On Nov 24, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

At the end +1
Jacques

From: "Scott Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Ah ok, so you're talking about when the pk changes and then changes again

but the entity name remains the same.

new entity.
Regards
Scott
2008/11/24 Hans Bakker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I guess the idea sounds fine to me, my only concern would be how clear the numbers are to people not familiar with what they mean. Also entities starting with numbers will end up at the top of lists in webtools which would be a pain, they might be better at the back so that they stay near the

if you have more than one change on the same entity "old" will not work

anymore..

On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 20:22 +1300, Scott Gray wrote:
> Hi Hans

having
> with the way things are currently handled and how does this change
address

why
> we need to change.
>
> Thanks
> Scott
>
> 2008/11/24 Hans Bakker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>

> >
> > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
> >
> > If there are no objections i will incorporate it in the text.
> >
> > --
> > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive prices
> >
> >
--
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive prices

> I see a proposition there, but no reasons why. What problems are you > those problems? I'm not objecting as such, I'd just like to understand > > I have added a proposal for change as a comment to the document at:

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature