I have a problem with it too.
Anyone who is trying to upgrade from a revision that has more than two
versions of the same table would need to do it incrementally anyway.
-Adrian
David E Jones wrote:
I have a pretty big problem with this actually.
First: changes to pks should be pretty limited, and when done should be
carefully reviewed. These are a significant difficulty when upgrading
and should never be done lightly or without looking at other alternatives.
Second: when we "deprecate" an entity the new entity should have a
totally different name, and NEVER be the same as the old entity. That
means that if the new one were deprecated, it could have "Old" added as
a prefix without conflicting with the entity that it replaced.
-David
On Nov 24, 2008, at 2:12 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
I have added a proposal for change as a comment to the document at:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
If there are no objections i will incorporate it in the text.
--
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive prices
