Ahhh -- so this implies that the error is "harder" than a failure then? This seems to imply that you want to use a failure when you have done some work you want to persist, but the operation itself was not completely successful? Would that be a fair statement?
That is actually why the "failure" return was introduced. It is distinguished from "error" in that it does not cause a transaction rollback. -David -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ServiceDispatcher-does-not-rollback-on-failure-tp21037143p21037799.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
