David, I copied the intention on the [email protected] list on Jan25.
My intention was to first move and then change the installation to what we wanted. At that time i did not see any problems from our end. Do we have them now? Regards, Hans On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 01:38 -0600, David E Jones wrote: > That's an interesting link, and an interesting start of a > conversation... though somewhat surprising. > > However, what do you mean when you wrote that we are ready to move? As > described in the board report there are various barriers to a move... > and this is complicated quite a bit by wanting to move to running many > of these things on OFBiz instead of on existing ASF infra tools > (especially Confluence and Jira). > > Whatever the case... could we at least coordinate within the community > before approaching infra? They're going to get pretty confused by > varied and inconsistent requests coming from OFBiz! > > In the last few days I heard of a couple of people approaching ASF > infra without any mention of it on the dev or at least the private > mailing lists (though I think dev IS the place for this conversation > and coordination). > > -David > > > On Mar 13, 2009, at 1:31 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: > > > You might want to mention the issue i raised about the Apache > > infrastructure: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1877 > > > > > > On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 00:57 -0600, David E Jones wrote: > >> I wrote an early rough draft for the Board Report for Mar 2009. It is > >> available here: > >> > >> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/ASF+Board+Report+2009-03 > >> > >> This is not finalized yet and there are a couple of days left > >> before I > >> have to submit it, so please send comments and thoughts to make it > >> better and more complete! > >> > >> -David > >> > > -- > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > > > -- Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
