Re: Simple-method-test-suite

[Scott Gray]

Yeah I think that's the best option too, I'll make sure it's documented in the xsd so the behavior is clear. Thanks Ashish.

Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 2/05/2009, at 7:06 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:

Please see my comments inline:

Scott Gray wrote:

Hi All,



The way I see it there are two options:

In a test def I would like to be able to specify a entire file of simple-method tests where every simple method in the file would be run in succession similar to how junit-test-suite works where every method in a class is run as a test. 1. Remove the requirement that the simple-method-test element must provide a simple method name to run. If it is omitted then then every simple method should be run.

Instead of adding new element I will prefer to update the code to handle the case of keeping simple method name optional. Like if we don't have simple method name then run all the simple methods present in a file and if we have simple method name then run only that one.

WDYT ?

--
Ashish

2. Add a new element simple-method-test-suite specifically for this purpose.

The goal here is to make tests a little easier to write.

Thanks
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature