On May 2, 2009, at 1:06 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
Please see my comments inline:
Scott Gray wrote:
Hi All,
In a test def I would like to be able to specify a entire file of
simple-method tests where every simple method in the file would be
run in succession similar to how junit-test-suite works where every
method in a class is run as a test.
The way I see it there are two options:
1. Remove the requirement that the simple-method-test element must
provide a simple method name to run. If it is omitted then then
every simple method should be run.
Instead of adding new element I will prefer to update the code to
handle the case of keeping simple method name optional.
Like if we don't have simple method name then run all the simple
methods present in a file and if we have simple method name then run
only that one.
I agree, that sounds line a much better option and is pretty intuitive
(ie it makes sense it would work that way).
-David
2. Add a new element simple-method-test-suite specifically for
this purpose.
The goal here is to make tests a little easier to write.
Thanks
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
