Scott,

Are you sure all tests pass? I'm seeing errors in the entity engine test - 
testBlobCreate. I thought it might be caused by my recent Blob converter 
commit, so I reverted it locally. I still get the same error. Looking at the 
code causing the error (GenericEntity.java line 420) it appears to me this test 
never should have succeeded.

-Adrian

--- On Mon, 11/23/09, Scott Gray <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Scott Gray <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: All JUnit tests now pass! Next steps...
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, November 23, 2009, 7:53 PM
> Quick update, I've since learnt that
> we've already had the trunk and 9.04 branch running on
> buildbot at the ASF for a few months now.  I've created
> an infra ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2345)
> requesting that build notifications be sent to the dev list
> and also that the run-install and run-tests targets be added
> to the buildbot configuration (for the trunk only).
> 
> Regards
> Scott
> 
> On 20/11/2009, at 9:06 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for the pointer Christian, I figured the ASF
> would have something for us and they haven't disappointed
> :-)
> > 
> > I'll keep playing around the different CI services
> locally for a little bit so I can learn how they work a bit
> better and also find the one that will be the most useful to
> us.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Scott
> > 
> > On 20/11/2009, at 1:08 AM, Christian Geisert wrote:
> > 
> >> Scott Gray schrieb:
> >>> It took a while but all our JUnit tests now
> pass, next I'd like to get a continuous integration server
> set up.  Can anybody recommend some tools
> >> 
> >> Why not just use what is available at the ASF ;-)
> >> 
> >> http://ci.apache.org/
> >> 
> >> I use Hudson and like it, but I haven't tried the
> others...
> >> 
> >>> Once that is done I'd like to have it run the
> tests after every commit and report any failures to the dev
> list.  It would then be the offending committer's
> responsibility (well primarily at least) to fix the problem
> as soon as possible, much like a build failure.  If we
> can't get everyone to agree to take on that responsibility
> then I might as well stop now because I'll be damned if I'm
> going to spend any more time fixing tests that I didn't
> break :-)
> >> 
> >> +1
> >> 
> >>> All of this should help us increase the
> stability of the trunk and our confidence when taking a
> checkout that we won't half to spend our development time
> fixing things that used to work.  It'll hopefully also
> encourage the community to contribute more tests with the
> knowledge that doing so will increase the stability of the
> functionality they depend on.  Fix a bug and you're
> good for a day, write a test and you're good a lifetime :-)
> >> 
> >> Absolutly agreed, big thanks for your (and all the
> others) work in this area!
> >> 
> >> --Christian
> >> 
> > 
> 
> 



Reply via email to