Hey Scott,

I think I am responsible for this (I have changed some of the demo data 
yesterday).
I am going to fix them right away, so don't waste your time on this.

Thank you for the notice,

Jacopo

On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Scott Gray wrote:

> BTW, the accounting tests are failing at the moment but I'll have them fixed 
> again shortly.
> 
> Regards
> Scott
> 
> On 24/11/2009, at 6:09 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
> 
>> Hi Adrian,
>> 
>> Yeah that issue has been there for a while but you'll notice that the 
>> exception is just a logged exception and isn't actually thrown, hence no 
>> error and the test passes.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Scott
>> 
>> On 24/11/2009, at 6:01 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>> 
>>> Scott,
>>> 
>>> Are you sure all tests pass? I'm seeing errors in the entity engine test - 
>>> testBlobCreate. I thought it might be caused by my recent Blob converter 
>>> commit, so I reverted it locally. I still get the same error. Looking at 
>>> the code causing the error (GenericEntity.java line 420) it appears to me 
>>> this test never should have succeeded.
>>> 
>>> -Adrian
>>> 
>>> --- On Mon, 11/23/09, Scott Gray <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> From: Scott Gray <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: All JUnit tests now pass! Next steps...
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Date: Monday, November 23, 2009, 7:53 PM
>>>> Quick update, I've since learnt that
>>>> we've already had the trunk and 9.04 branch running on
>>>> buildbot at the ASF for a few months now.  I've created
>>>> an infra ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2345)
>>>> requesting that build notifications be sent to the dev list
>>>> and also that the run-install and run-tests targets be added
>>>> to the buildbot configuration (for the trunk only).
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> Scott
>>>> 
>>>> On 20/11/2009, at 9:06 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for the pointer Christian, I figured the ASF
>>>> would have something for us and they haven't disappointed
>>>> :-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'll keep playing around the different CI services
>>>> locally for a little bit so I can learn how they work a bit
>>>> better and also find the one that will be the most useful to
>>>> us.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Scott
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 20/11/2009, at 1:08 AM, Christian Geisert wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Scott Gray schrieb:
>>>>>>> It took a while but all our JUnit tests now
>>>> pass, next I'd like to get a continuous integration server
>>>> set up.  Can anybody recommend some tools
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why not just use what is available at the ASF ;-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I use Hudson and like it, but I haven't tried the
>>>> others...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Once that is done I'd like to have it run the
>>>> tests after every commit and report any failures to the dev
>>>> list.  It would then be the offending committer's
>>>> responsibility (well primarily at least) to fix the problem
>>>> as soon as possible, much like a build failure.  If we
>>>> can't get everyone to agree to take on that responsibility
>>>> then I might as well stop now because I'll be damned if I'm
>>>> going to spend any more time fixing tests that I didn't
>>>> break :-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> All of this should help us increase the
>>>> stability of the trunk and our confidence when taking a
>>>> checkout that we won't half to spend our development time
>>>> fixing things that used to work.  It'll hopefully also
>>>> encourage the community to contribute more tests with the
>>>> knowledge that doing so will increase the stability of the
>>>> functionality they depend on.  Fix a bug and you're
>>>> good for a day, write a test and you're good a lifetime :-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Absolutly agreed, big thanks for your (and all the
>>>> others) work in this area!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --Christian
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to