I am pushing the infra team for subdomains and certificates
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 16:55 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote:
> The site has been updated and I've pushed it - will take about 30 minutes to
> propagate. I have also put these redirects in place for bookmarks. Hans,
> when you're back around, can you work with the infra team to get these
> servers up?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Cheers,
> Ruppert
>
> On Feb 1, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>
> > Sorry - I wasn't more clear here. What I meant to say is that:
> >
> > 1. I will put the redirects in place
> > -- There are tons of people out there with bookmarks and I'd rather not
> > have them just get an error.
> >
> > 2. And I will update the links on the site so that it will remove the
> > dependency in general.
> >
> > If I shouldn't put the redirects in place now that you know what I meant to
> > say (sorry for not being clear), then I can definitely do that - but my
> > guess is that both would be a reasonable idea for the transition.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ruppert
> >
> > ----- "David E Jones" <d...@me.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not sure if I understand correctly, but what is there to put in
> >> place? Are you thinking of trying to set things up so that the old
> >> URLs are supported? If so, why?
> >>
> >> Why not just change the links instead of putting forwards and such in
> >> place, which are going to be temporary anyway and also still leave a
> >> dependency on Contegix (which I don't think is a good idea)?
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
> >> On Feb 1, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jacques, Hans, since you guys have been very active in migrating
> >> this information to the ASF infra, I'm leaning on you to help me know
> >> when and how you'd like me to put this stuff in place. It looks like
> >> the four I've listed below are in place - but I'm not sure what the
> >> plan was on the others.
> >>>
> >>> I'm happy to help in any way, but I'm just supporting I don't know
> >> what the intentions are of the people getting this stuff moved over.
> >> Let me know!
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Ruppert
> >>>
> >>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Here are the links that I know about - but there are many others
> >> that need to be thought about in this migration:
> >>>>
> >>>> build.ofbiz.org - http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/
> >>>> api.ofbiz.org - http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/
> >>>> demo.ofbiz.org - http://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/ecommerce/
> >>>> -- Not sure where the other demos are ....
> >>>> demo.ofbiz.org backend -
> >> https://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/catalog/control/main
> >>>>
> >>>> There are a few others that I don't know about:
> >>>>
> >>>> demo904.hotwaxmedia.com
> >>>> demo40.hotwaxmedia.com
> >>>> bigfiles.hotwaxmedia.com
> >>>> www.ofbiz.org
> >>>> svn.ofbiz.org
> >>>> etc
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyways, I can make these happen ASAP since the DNS is still at
> >> Contegix until it migrates to ASF shortly (at least that's what I'm
> >> hearing) - so please let me know what you'd like to do - and what
> >> you're changing on the site so that I can support these changes. I
> >> look forward to getting this up on ASF infra since that's where
> >> everyone wanted to be going.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Ruppert
> >>>> --
> >>>> Tim Ruppert
> >>>> HotWax Media
> >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> >>>>
> >>>> o:801.649.6594
> >>>> f:801.649.6595
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 5:13 PM, David E Jones wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, I do still own the domain. It expires in May of this year,
> >> and I've been planning to transfer it to the ASF (if they want it, not
> >> sure if/how that works...) closer to before it expires.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Right now the domain is managed by name servers at Contegix so
> >> that they could maintain things more easily.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I can point it back to name servers that I control and then point
> >> the various sub-domains wherever, and perhaps at this point that's the
> >> best thing to do.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How is the server at that IP address setup? I tried going to the
> >> plain IP in the browser and it won't respond, which makes me wonder if
> >> everything running on it is setup by virtual domain. If that's the
> >> case then it will need to be ready to have demo.ofbiz.org pointed to
> >> it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also, is there just one demo setup over there for the trunk, or
> >> are there various demos setup for release4.0 and release09.04? If
> >> there is just one demo then I don't think we should point
> >> demo904.ofbiz.org over.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BTW, I've moved this over to the dev mailing list since it's more
> >> of a project management thing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On a related topic: a better solution overall would be to change
> >> all of the links to the new ASF sub-domains since that is the more
> >> permanent home for all of these resources. I'm not sure if the ASF has
> >> a policy on this, but I do think that keeping everything under the
> >> apache.org domain and under infra control is the best way to go.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -David
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Who has control over ofbiz.org? David?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> what we can do is point this domainname to the apache vm so we
> >> can keep
> >>>>>> on using the ssl certificates....
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> do put:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> demo.ofbiz.org to 140.211.11.41
> >>>>>> demo904.ofbiz.org to 140.211.11.41
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> i will ask infra for a second ip....
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>> Hans
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
>
--
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
