they seem to have a regular maintenance going and promised to get it back as quick as possible.
Regards, Hans On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 23:48 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote: > Thanks Hans - I've been seeing that and it's appreciated. Can you get the > standard trunk version up in the meantime though? Why is it having so much > trouble? > > Cheers, > Ruppert > > On Feb 1, 2010, at 11:43 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > > > I am pushing the infra team for subdomains and certificates > > > > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 16:55 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >> The site has been updated and I've pushed it - will take about 30 minutes > >> to propagate. I have also put these redirects in place for bookmarks. > >> Hans, when you're back around, can you work with the infra team to get > >> these servers up? > >> > >> Thanks in advance. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Ruppert > >> > >> On Feb 1, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >> > >>> Sorry - I wasn't more clear here. What I meant to say is that: > >>> > >>> 1. I will put the redirects in place > >>> -- There are tons of people out there with bookmarks and I'd rather not > >>> have them just get an error. > >>> > >>> 2. And I will update the links on the site so that it will remove the > >>> dependency in general. > >>> > >>> If I shouldn't put the redirects in place now that you know what I meant > >>> to say (sorry for not being clear), then I can definitely do that - but > >>> my guess is that both would be a reasonable idea for the transition. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Ruppert > >>> > >>> ----- "David E Jones" <d...@me.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I'm not sure if I understand correctly, but what is there to put in > >>>> place? Are you thinking of trying to set things up so that the old > >>>> URLs are supported? If so, why? > >>>> > >>>> Why not just change the links instead of putting forwards and such in > >>>> place, which are going to be temporary anyway and also still leave a > >>>> dependency on Contegix (which I don't think is a good idea)? > >>>> > >>>> -David > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Feb 1, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Jacques, Hans, since you guys have been very active in migrating > >>>> this information to the ASF infra, I'm leaning on you to help me know > >>>> when and how you'd like me to put this stuff in place. It looks like > >>>> the four I've listed below are in place - but I'm not sure what the > >>>> plan was on the others. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm happy to help in any way, but I'm just supporting I don't know > >>>> what the intentions are of the people getting this stuff moved over. > >>>> Let me know! > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Ruppert > >>>>> > >>>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Here are the links that I know about - but there are many others > >>>> that need to be thought about in this migration: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> build.ofbiz.org - http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/ > >>>>>> api.ofbiz.org - http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ > >>>>>> demo.ofbiz.org - http://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/ecommerce/ > >>>>>> -- Not sure where the other demos are .... > >>>>>> demo.ofbiz.org backend - > >>>> https://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/catalog/control/main > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There are a few others that I don't know about: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> demo904.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>>> demo40.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>>> bigfiles.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>>> www.ofbiz.org > >>>>>> svn.ofbiz.org > >>>>>> etc > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Anyways, I can make these happen ASAP since the DNS is still at > >>>> Contegix until it migrates to ASF shortly (at least that's what I'm > >>>> hearing) - so please let me know what you'd like to do - and what > >>>> you're changing on the site so that I can support these changes. I > >>>> look forward to getting this up on ASF infra since that's where > >>>> everyone wanted to be going. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> Ruppert > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Tim Ruppert > >>>>>> HotWax Media > >>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> o:801.649.6594 > >>>>>> f:801.649.6595 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 5:13 PM, David E Jones wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yes, I do still own the domain. It expires in May of this year, > >>>> and I've been planning to transfer it to the ASF (if they want it, not > >>>> sure if/how that works...) closer to before it expires. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Right now the domain is managed by name servers at Contegix so > >>>> that they could maintain things more easily. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I can point it back to name servers that I control and then point > >>>> the various sub-domains wherever, and perhaps at this point that's the > >>>> best thing to do. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> How is the server at that IP address setup? I tried going to the > >>>> plain IP in the browser and it won't respond, which makes me wonder if > >>>> everything running on it is setup by virtual domain. If that's the > >>>> case then it will need to be ready to have demo.ofbiz.org pointed to > >>>> it. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Also, is there just one demo setup over there for the trunk, or > >>>> are there various demos setup for release4.0 and release09.04? If > >>>> there is just one demo then I don't think we should point > >>>> demo904.ofbiz.org over. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> BTW, I've moved this over to the dev mailing list since it's more > >>>> of a project management thing. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On a related topic: a better solution overall would be to change > >>>> all of the links to the new ASF sub-domains since that is the more > >>>> permanent home for all of these resources. I'm not sure if the ASF has > >>>> a policy on this, but I do think that keeping everything under the > >>>> apache.org domain and under infra control is the best way to go. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -David > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Who has control over ofbiz.org? David? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> what we can do is point this domainname to the apache vm so we > >>>> can keep > >>>>>>>> on using the ssl certificates.... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> do put: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> demo.ofbiz.org to 140.211.11.41 > >>>>>>>> demo904.ofbiz.org to 140.211.11.41 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> i will ask infra for a second ip.... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> regards, > >>>>>>>> Hans > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > > -- > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > > > -- Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
