For the record, here are the top level files without license header: .classpath .gitignore .hgignore .project debian/compat debian/copyright.in debian/po/templates.pot
BTW, I don't see potential license issue in them and so probably no action is required. Jacopo On Feb 18, 2010, at 12:42 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > On an Eclipse .project file? > > Jacques > > From: "Adam Heath" <[email protected]> >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> On 17/02/2010, at 4:09 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >>> >>>> David E Jones wrote: >>>>> Adam, >>>>> >>>>> Maybe you didn't notice, but this was a single commit from over a year >>>>> ago. >>>> What does the timeframe of the commit have to do with my question? >>>> There was a license header, now there isn't, and I checked trunk first >>>> before sending my question, to see if it had been added in the mean time. >>>> >>> >>> My guess is that the file was modified automatically by Eclipse (hence the >>> license removal) during David's development work and was committed when he >>> committed that work, accidentally or otherwise. >>> >>> If it bothers you then add it back, I don't think we've really got anything >>> in that file in terms of new work and the header isn't entirely necessary >>> IMO. >> >> Apache requires it. > >
