ok, Adrian, thank you for the feedback... I will investigate more and fix it.

Jacopo

On Feb 25, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:

> No, it has nothing to do with the recent changes because the same error is 
> generated in R 9.04.
> 
> -Adrian
> 
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> If you go here:
>> https://localhost:8443/manufacturing/control/EditCalendarWeek?calendarWeekId=DEFAULT
>> and try to update the values on the screen you get the following error in 
>> the log:
>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Database type warning GenericEntity.set =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 
>> In entity field [TechDataCalendarWeek.mondayCapacity] set the value passed 
>> in [java.math.BigDecimal] is not compatible with the Java type of the field 
>> [Double]
>> Exception: java.lang.Exception
>> Message: Location of database type warning
>> ---- stack trace 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> java.lang.Exception: Location of database type warning
>> org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntity.set(GenericEntity.java:422)
>> org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntity.set(GenericEntity.java:368)
>> org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntity.setAllFields(GenericEntity.java:885)
>> org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntity.setNonPKFields(GenericEntity.java:841)
>> org.ofbiz.minilang.method.entityops.SetNonpkFields.exec(SetNonpkFields.java:81)
>> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:920)
>> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.exec(SimpleMethod.java:739)
>> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleMethod(SimpleMethod.java:160)
>> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleService(SimpleMethod.java:142)
>> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.serviceInvoker(SimpleServiceEngine.java:78)
>> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.runSync(SimpleServiceEngine.java:53)
>> org.ofbiz.service.ModelServiceReader$GenericInvokerImpl.runSync(ModelServiceReader.java:747)
>> applications.manufacturing.servicedef.services_95$calendar_46$xml_35$updateCalendarWeek.runSync(file:applications/manufacturing/servicedef/services_calendar.xml#updateCalendarWeek:68)
>> Is it possible it is caused by recent changes to the conversion framework?
> 

Reply via email to