I rather see it differently. Framework components should core ones that compare to similar things out there. I will rather have help move out of framework instead of moving content and Party into framework.
I think we should do /framework, /baseapps, /applications We can put all those core components that need data model in /baseapps. Thanks and Regards Anil Patel HotWax Media Inc Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" On Feb 26, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Christopher Snow wrote: > Yes, I have looked at the patch. I am in favor of it. My reasoning: "help" > would be important functionality for the framework. Help depends on some > content tables which in turn depend on some party components. > > By moving entities in a similar hack, I have managed to get a standalone > framework running and switch back to the full ofbiz just by changing > component-load.xml > > Scott Gray wrote: >> Have you even looked at the patch? It is certainly not intended to be >> committed. >> >> Are you in favor of the patch? If so, could you please explain why you >> would like to see the party and content application components included in a >> framework only release? >> >> Thanks >> Scott >> >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> On 26/02/2010, at 12:22 PM, Christopher Snow wrote: >> >> >>> Bruno's question: >>> >>> "So could we please review the patch? >>> Does it make sense?" >>> >>> If there are no major objections, then I guess he will commit it? >>> >>> Scott Gray wrote: >>> >>>> What exactly are you requesting that people vote on? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> HotWax Media >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>> >>>> On 26/02/2010, at 12:15 PM, Christopher Snow wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Bruno has a patch that will allow us to run ofbiz standalone - without >>>>> breaking anything! >>>>> >>>>> This is a small but important step towards framework independence... >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505 >>>>> >>>>> Many thanks in advance, >>>>> >>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>> >> >> >
