there is a ant build target create-admin-user-login do a ant -p
Ruth Hoffman sent the following on 2/26/2010 12:56 PM: > Hi Chris: > If user management is included in the following, then I agree. I don't > think I've ever created an application that didn't have at least an > administrative user. > > If not I'd add (basic) user management. > > Ruth > > Christopher Snow wrote: >> Hi Anil, >> >> I believe a standalone application development framework should have >> all the functionality a developer needs to create an application, i.e. >> >> - persistence >> - services >> - presentation tier >> - reporting >> - help >> - security management >> - job scheduler >> - audit trail >> >> Cheers, >> >> Chris >> >> Anil Patel wrote: >>> I rather see it differently. >>> Framework components should core ones that compare to similar things >>> out there. I will rather have help move out of framework instead of >>> moving content and Party into framework. >>> >>> I think we should do /framework, /baseapps, /applications >>> >>> We can put all those core components that need data model in >>> /baseapps. Thanks and Regards >>> Anil Patel >>> HotWax Media Inc >>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" >>> >>> On Feb 26, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Christopher Snow wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Yes, I have looked at the patch. I am in favor of it. My >>>> reasoning: "help" would be important functionality for the >>>> framework. Help depends on some content tables which in turn depend >>>> on some party components. >>>> >>>> By moving entities in a similar hack, I have managed to get a >>>> standalone framework running and switch back to the full ofbiz just >>>> by changing component-load.xml >>>> >>>> Scott Gray wrote: >>>> >>>>> Have you even looked at the patch? It is certainly not intended to >>>>> be committed. >>>>> >>>>> Are you in favor of the patch? If so, could you please explain why >>>>> you would like to see the party and content application components >>>>> included in a framework only release? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>>> HotWax Media >>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>> >>>>> On 26/02/2010, at 12:22 PM, Christopher Snow wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Bruno's question: >>>>>> >>>>>> "So could we please review the patch? >>>>>> Does it make sense?" >>>>>> >>>>>> If there are no major objections, then I guess he will commit it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Scott Gray wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> What exactly are you requesting that people vote on? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Scott >>>>>>> >>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 26/02/2010, at 12:15 PM, Christopher Snow wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bruno has a patch that will allow us to run ofbiz standalone - >>>>>>>> without breaking anything! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is a small but important step towards framework >>>>>>>> independence... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Many thanks in advance, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chris >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
