Hi Bob,
Sorry for the "resolved" misleading. It was not a problem for me because I use another way to manage issues not closed. But anyway,
It's only a matter of asking to infra. For instance, I have already asked to remove the question type at INFRA-2206. Thanks to your
reference, I have asked for the same than INFRA-1659 at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2586
Jacques
From: "Bob Morley" <[email protected]>
Tim Ruppert wrote:
I think it makes sense to have some way of distinguishing issues that have
been filed from ones that have been filed and fix is provided - but I'm
not sure about adding additional statuses to the workflow. Normally I'd
totally agree (I've coded many workflows and creating custom statuses in
JIRA and it's really powerful) - but I'm not sure how much access we would
have to things at that level with infra.
Seeing that other ASF projects had these statuses in play I took a quick
search across these projects and was able to find one INFRA ticket that was
very similar : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1659. This being
the case, I suspect it would just be a matter of Ofbiz consensus and the
right person cutting the INFRA ticket. My guess is that David Jones likely
setup our ASF JIRA project and is likely our JIRA admin? (I seem to recall
reading something that suggested a project could have two admins; but I do
not recall).
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Use-of-JIRA-Resolved-status-tp1747129p1747620.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
