Seems like something that would make things clearer so probably not a bad way to go. If there was a way to see from the attachments that we had an upload already, I'd probably go for that - but in the absence, the additional status seems like a reasonable request to me. +1
Cheers, Ruppert On Mar 31, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Bob Morley wrote: > > > Tim Ruppert wrote: >> >> I think it makes sense to have some way of distinguishing issues that have >> been filed from ones that have been filed and fix is provided - but I'm >> not sure about adding additional statuses to the workflow. Normally I'd >> totally agree (I've coded many workflows and creating custom statuses in >> JIRA and it's really powerful) - but I'm not sure how much access we would >> have to things at that level with infra. >> > > Seeing that other ASF projects had these statuses in play I took a quick > search across these projects and was able to find one INFRA ticket that was > very similar : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1659. This being > the case, I suspect it would just be a matter of Ofbiz consensus and the > right person cutting the INFRA ticket. My guess is that David Jones likely > setup our ASF JIRA project and is likely our JIRA admin? (I seem to recall > reading something that suggested a project could have two admins; but I do > not recall). > -- > View this message in context: > http://n4.nabble.com/Use-of-JIRA-Resolved-status-tp1747129p1747620.html > Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
