BJ - we will have to disagree on the interpretation of those pages.
In principle, am ok with Jacopo's suggestion. However, the
relationship is between two parties, and in this case we are talking
about a seller and a product. If there was a unique set of conditions
between a seller and a buyer then it makes perfect sense to model this
as an agreement. Without any changes, I would guess this would end up
being an agreement between either the "_NA" party or a party group
that contains all customers in the system. Neither of these would
feel like the right thing to do ...
On Apr 13, 2010, at 7:03 PM, BJ Freeman (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856675
#action_12856675 ]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3633:
-----------------------------------
Bob
the pages you refer to are for company to Manufacture a product then
have supplier (distributors) sell that product.
this is different than order from a supplier to get raw materials.
order and order from a customer
covered on page 107 and 109.
I like Jacopo's suggestion to use the Agreements
from the datamodel book
"An agreement is a set of terms and conditions that govern
relationships between two parties."
also
You can have product agreements where each product can have this
relationship both for customers and suppliers.with the company
