Robert, did you manage to read Chapter 8 of Volume 3 of the DMRB? I am curious if that pattern could solve your problem. -Jeroen
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Robert Morley <[email protected]> wrote: > BJ - we will have to disagree on the interpretation of those pages. > > In principle, am ok with Jacopo's suggestion. However, the relationship is > between two parties, and in this case we are talking about a seller and a > product. If there was a unique set of conditions between a seller and a > buyer then it makes perfect sense to model this as an agreement. Without > any changes, I would guess this would end up being an agreement between > either the "_NA" party or a party group that contains all customers in the > system. Neither of these would feel like the right thing to do ... > > > On Apr 13, 2010, at 7:03 PM, BJ Freeman (JIRA) wrote: > >> >> [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856675#action_12856675 >> ] >> >> BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3633: >> ----------------------------------- >> >> Bob >> the pages you refer to are for company to Manufacture a product then have >> supplier (distributors) sell that product. >> this is different than order from a supplier to get raw materials. order >> and order from a customer >> covered on page 107 and 109. >> >> I like Jacopo's suggestion to use the Agreements >> from the datamodel book >> "An agreement is a set of terms and conditions that govern relationships >> between two parties." >> also >> You can have product agreements where each product can have this >> relationship both for customers and suppliers.with the company > >
