I couldn't agree with you more Michael. Regards Scott
On 18/10/2010, at 2:45 PM, Michael Xu (xudong) wrote: > hi Scott, > > I don't know much about Quartz. But I really think it is the correct > direction to migrate home-grown codes to mature third party solution or > separate mature ofbiz components as standalone framework. As such, we can > focus on value creation and furthermore it might help attract more > developers to join. > > -- > Regards, > Michael Xu (xudong) > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Scott Gray <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I was looking at the Quartz Scheduler project (www.quartz-scheduler.org) >> over the weekend and it looks like it could be a good fit for OFBiz. We ran >> into some issues with the scheduled service code in OFBiz recently where a >> heavy server load would cause all sorts of strangeness (multiple reschedules >> for a single failed job, inability to purge old jobs before a timeout, those >> two combined eventually bringing the server to its knees), and my options >> are to either find and fix the problem(s) or replace the scheduler with an >> external solution. >> >> I've only had a brief look but it appears like quartz is pretty extensible >> and would allow us to continue to support things like temporal expressions >> (and the deprecated recurrence infos) and could probably increase the number >> of scheduling features available to OFBiz. It's ASL2 licensed and seems to >> be pretty mature. >> >> Does anyone have any experience with quartz to share? Opinions or other >> possible alternatives would be most welcome. I'm not looking to implement >> anything anytime soon but figured we may as well start discussing it. >> >> Thanks >> Scott >> >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
