Another more important point that makes me wonder is the total removing of Dojo
and Prototype in the jQuery branch. Of course, the
branch is intended to be merged. So I guess it will a problem for those who are
working with the trunk. On the other hand, I believe
we want to get rid of Dojo and Prototype in the future. At least it's the consensus we got when we decided to create this branch,
and
we have worked much on it since (it's almost finished)...
I think the best answer is to create patch(es?) and to put it in a sub-task under
"Query Implementtion - Umbrella Main Task"
(OFBIZ-3814). This sub-task and its patch(es?) will contain the necessary
information for a custom project based on the trunk to
not worry about the merge. I'd really appreciate a little help on that tough. I
think there are enough persons interested...
TIA
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]>
Thanks Sascha, Jacopo,
At revision: 1035463, I finally removed jQuery UI docs and demo. Actually, it
was far easier for me than re-adding plugins
docs/demos
Jacques
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[email protected]>
Hi Jacques,
my preference is to leave documentation and demos out of the project to keep it
cleaner and lighter; I also think that
maintaining the version in the file name has some advantages: custom decorators
will have to be changed but this is also a good
reminder for the developers to check that the custom screens work well with the
upgraded libraries.
Kind regards,
Jacopo
On Nov 12, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I dither about some minor points in the jQuery branch and would like to have
your opinions.
Should we embed the docs and demos for the extensions (plugins, etc.). I guess
so because it's convenient when working without
Internet connection. On the other hand it's a bit heavy.
For now, for some plugins, we put the version in the lib name. This is ok OOTB,
but for custom apps users may not notice a
plugin version change and would not change their own decorators. So I wonder
if, like Sascha suggested recently, we should not
rather have no version in plugins names.
Thanks
Jacques
