Hi Jacques, my preference is to leave documentation and demos out of the project to keep it cleaner and lighter; I also think that maintaining the version in the file name has some advantages: custom decorators will have to be changed but this is also a good reminder for the developers to check that the custom screens work well with the upgraded libraries.
Kind regards, Jacopo On Nov 12, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > I dither about some minor points in the jQuery branch and would like to have > your opinions. > > Should we embed the docs and demos for the extensions (plugins, etc.). I > guess so because it's convenient when working without Internet connection. On > the other hand it's a bit heavy. > > For now, for some plugins, we put the version in the lib name. This is ok > OOTB, but for custom apps users may not notice a plugin version change and > would not change their own decorators. So I wonder if, like Sascha suggested > recently, we should not rather have no version in plugins names. > > Thanks > > Jacques >
