I was thinking to use another generic security check based on a naming
convention (e.g. a security service with entity name and something).
Jacopo
On Mar 7, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> What permission checks would be performed?
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> On 3/7/2012 2:53 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> I am resurrecting the initial thread when the "entity-auto" engine was
>> implemented; this is a great addition but we could even push it at a further
>> level (again following the "configuration by exception" strategy):
>> why don't we make it optional the service definition for crud services?
>> The idea is that, if I call:
>>
>> Map result = dispatcher.runSync("createExampleEntityName",
>> UtilMisc.toMap(...));
>>
>> and the system can't find a service definition for createExampleEntityName
>> but it finds an entity definition for "ExampleEntityName" then it calls the
>> "entity-auto" service for it.
>> Of course same applies to create/update/delete.
>>
>> At that point, as soon as we define an entity we will also have
>> automatically the CRUD services.
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
