Scott made a good point.
If there is duplicated code, and they don't add much useful
functionality, then they can move out, provided this will not break
anything.
+1


On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Scott Gray <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have no problem with moving them out.
>
> Pierre, there is actually very little functionality available to either of 
> those apps and nothing that isn't already available in the main accounting 
> app.  They do however carry the burden of two extra webapps and a LOT of 
> duplicated code.  There is nothing there that couldn't be achieved with 
> better handling of the permissions within the main accounting app.  The goal 
> here as with all of these cleanup efforts is to reduce unnecessary elements 
> within OFBiz, improve the consistency of what is available and then move 
> forward with good design on a solid base.
>
> Moving components, webapps and whatever else to Extras is simply saying that 
> we don't believe these items belong in a core OFBiz distribution, nothing 
> prevents them from being maintained by the community and used by anyone who 
> would choose to do so.  If there is doubt that the components would be 
> maintained after leaving OFBiz then in my mind that is more of a reason to 
> discard them than to keep them.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> On 10/04/2012, at 1:09 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>
>> Hi Anil,
>>
>> Are you proposing and committing yourself to bring all non-overlapping
>> functions in AP and AR to the core of the accounting application whilst
>> maintaining the added value these to sub components offer regarding user
>> friendliness and separation of concerns BEFORE moving AP and AR out to the
>> pasture?
>>
>> In other words, redo all the work already done and perfectly working in
>> both sub components of accounting? I would say: if it aint broken, don't
>> try to fix it!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Pierre
>>
>>
>> Op 10 april 2012 00:41 schreef Anil Patel <[email protected]> het
>> volgende:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I agree that toolset for supporting AR and AP processes are important for
>>> a business. Like Jacopo mentioned, AR and AP webapplications don't have any
>>> that does not already exists in Accounting webapplication.
>>>
>>> AR and AP webapplications are special purpose apps that try bring together
>>> screens relevant to context and User Role. So by removing AR and AP
>>> application from Accounting component we'll not be removing any
>>> functionality. User will still be able to do comparable thing from
>>> Accounting application. If there are exception I'll ensure its added to
>>> accounting before removing AR and AP apps from Accounting application.
>>>
>>> Also Moving Application out from Accounting to Ofbiz Extras does not mean
>>> that we have abandoned it. All it means is, User will install those apps
>>> based on their needs. I have seen many eCommerce installations that don't
>>> use accounting application at all. Such users will appreciate to get slim
>>> down Ofbiz :)
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards
>>> Anil Patel
>>> HotWax Media Inc
>>>
>>> On Apr 8, 2012, at 4:13 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is very normal in FICO solutions to have as much as possible a
>>>> separation of concern implemented. This is applicable with regards to
>>>> inbound and outbound money flows (AR vs AP), and in and outbound flow of
>>>> goods (and the valueation thereof in FICO). For that (larger) companies
>>>> ensure that people involved in AR would not have access to functions in
>>> AP.
>>>> But in more sophisticated ERP solutions that also applicable with the
>>>> financial aspects of Asset Maint (that OFBiz has in the special purpose
>>>> application Asset Maint),stock movements,  the wages,tax, pensions and
>>> soc
>>>> sec administration of personell , and liquid asset (cash, banks and cc-)
>>>> administration.
>>>>
>>>> All these are normally handled in sub accounting solutions (as are AR and
>>>> AP, stock) where transactions are registered per identified item (ie the
>>>> customer, supplier, stock item) and consolidated in transactions entries
>>> in
>>>> the general part of FICO.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Pierre
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Op 8 april 2012 07:53 schreef Jacopo Cappellato <
>>>> [email protected]> het volgende:
>>>>
>>>>> But for what I understand the AR and AP applications contain alternative
>>>>> screens to the ones in the main "accounting" application. They are an
>>>>> effort to implement more focused/specific applications versus the more
>>>>> generic "accounting" application.
>>>>> So, the main "accounting" application should already contain both the
>>>>> AR/AP features, but some of its screens could serve both.
>>>>> I would be in favor of the removal if we can make sure that all the
>>>>> features that are removed are still available (even if in a more generic
>>>>> way) in the "accounting" application.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 8, 2012, at 1:23 AM, David E Jones wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I first saw the subject I was thinking this as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I always wondered why those were created as separate applications,
>>>>>> perhaps for permission reasons I suppose. In a way they make more sense
>>>>>> as part of the accounting webapp instead of in separate ones.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pierre Smits wrote:
>>>>>>> - 1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Accounts payable (AP) and accounts receivable (AP) are together with
>>> the
>>>>>>> ability to process accounting transactions the core ingredients of a
>>>>> good
>>>>>>> FICO solution. Without both any accountant will state that your
>>>>> accounting
>>>>>>> solution is worthless. Without both core accounting components you
>>> (as a
>>>>>>> company) would have no overview of money owed to you or that you owe
>>> to
>>>>>>> others.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pierre
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Op 7 april 2012 19:41 schreef Jacques Le Roux
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>het volgende:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anil Patel wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> Like lot of other stuff, I think AR and AP applications should be
>>>>> moved
>>>>>>>>> out of Ofbiz Accounting component. As such they are
>>>>>>>>> special purpose application, but again not core to Ofbiz application
>>>>>>>>> framework.
>>>>>>>>> I recommend we should relocate AR and AP webapplications out of
>>> Ofbiz
>>>>>>>>> Accounting to Ofbiz Extras. If we as community agree, I'll
>>>>>>>>> put efforts to complete the job.
>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>>>>>> Anil Patel
>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media Inc
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to